DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS VERSUS INTENDED OUTCOMES
Students certainly appeared to find the environment engaging
and were motivated to improve their scores each quarter. The
fact that almost all the students improved between the post-
and the delayed-post test highlights the fact that ongoing
learning was taking place outside of the program.
UNEXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES
The most unexpected result was the one outlined above, where
students maintained their interest after they had completed
the program, and reported that they were reading The Financial
Review, The Economist, and were talking to experienced investors
about some of the principles.
HOW LEARNER ENGAGEMENT IS SUPPORTED
The program was really built to accommodate the learners in
nearly all of the above ways. Some students reported that
they were able to concentrate better on the program than they
could in traditional classes, and observations of them using
the program enforced the fact that they experienced immersion
and “optimal flow”, as all the students had to
be reminded of the time.
The mindful engagement that derives from such a learning
environment stems not only from the novelty, but from the
realism, interactivity, fantasy, challenge, co-operation and
immersion that is a natural extension to its benefits.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF LEARNING CONTEXT
Most of these points have been answered in other sections,
but the students experienced positive transfer between their
other subjects of study and their everyday lives.
Diversity issues were taken into account in the building
of the program, with a mindful attempt at designing to accommodate
not only culture, but also age and gender.
HOW THE LEARNING DESIGN CHALLENGES LEARNERS
The program presented many challenges to the students. The
scope and depth of the content was challenging, and the presentation
of conflicting information challenged the students to think
about what they were doing and encouraged them to develop
their own strategies for investment. The students made many
comments on the challenges that they experienced, but few
of the experiences were seen as negative or limiting. The
challenges within the program appeared to strengthen its ability
to engage the students and to maintain their interest and
enthusiasm.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRACTICE
Because the students were immersed in a realistic and authentic
learning environment, everything that they did related to
practice. The act of investing, whether as a dyad or a single-allowed
students to demonstrate their learning and receive almost
instant feedback on their decisions. Students were not only
asked to make investment decisions, but also personal decisions
such as on ethics - again authentic decisions that caused
many of them to mention that they'd talked about these things
in other classes but it was not until they had to apply the
concepts that they realised how difficult some of the dilemmas
could be.
|