DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS VERSUS INTENDED OUTCOMES
Some reflective comments and observations are provided below
by the lecturer of BNB011 - Sam Bucolo.
Articles:
"The majority of students read the articles and got
a lot out of them - as evidenced in the editorial articles."
Editorials:
"I was very impressed with the quality of outcomes
for Editorial submissions."
"For submissions to Editorials (+ Case Studies) approx
80% submitted on time."
Case Studies:
- "Very impressed with the quality of outcomes for
Case studies."
- "Good progression week-to-week for practical case
studies."
- "Evidenced a progression of deeper learning across
the issues:
- Building up of a larger repertoire of knowledge/skills
- Building upon/adding to prior knowledge"
- "Deeper reflection not evident - like to see more
reflection in Case Studies"
Contextualised theory:
"Good evidence of contextualisation of theory via
the Editorial Submissions"
Was theory applied to case studies?
"Insight to be obtained via survey and discussions
with students."
UNEXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOMES
The BNB011 survey also revealed the importance of the face-to-face
tutorials in addition to the online resources; e.g. "Have
to have tutorials to help us clarify doubts which is good";
"I would like to suggest more face-to-face tutorial because
that is where you will ask questions"; "Tutorials
are the most important factor to develop your skills"
HOW LEARNER ENGAGEMENT IS SUPPORTED
The E-Journal methodology offers a unified approach to developing
both theoretical and technical skills through the use of Articles,
Editorial, Tutorial and Case Studies pages (see 'Learning
Design Details above'). Continuous assessment within each
issue provides a scaffolding effect for supported progression
towards resolution of the final design outcome. Each issue
provides a discreet learning experience within itself, as
well as building upon the previous issues experiences. The
E-Journal layout facilitates progressive insights into both
horizontal and vertical perspectives on the learning process
for both students and lecturers - horizontal progression across
the issues, and vertical perspectives within each topic-specific
issue.
The E-Journal methodology encourages active submissions
to the site by students. Positive scaled ratings and comments
were received by students of BNB011 about use of submission
tools, and about the ability to view peer work online. "Easier
than writing journals and could be done immediately post-research".
On viewing peer responses: "This mainly helps to clarify
that I was submitting what was required. It also kind of 'spurred'
me on to getting work up on time".
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF LEARNING CONTEXT
The E-Journal methodology has been specifically designed to
create a close link between broader theoretical and technical
issues and the discipline-specific contexts that they apply
to. This has been achieved through the adoption of the following
strategies:
- The E-Journal layout of six discreet issues that closely
align the broad theoretical knowledge with the associated
activities within each topic-specific issue.
- An emphasis on gearing teaching and learning towards
each student's unique discipline through aiming both Editorial
submissions and Case Study development directly to their
own discipline and prior experience. Example of Editorial
topic: "After reading the above article, write a letter
to the Editor on how you believe 'shared worlds' can be
incorporated into your own discipline as an effective tool."
In this way, students are encouraged to start considering
future applications of their new insights into their own
discipline. As commented by a student in the BNB011 survey:
"Encouragement to do discipline related research for
editorials helped a lot and made it easier not to make same
mistakes".
Assessment tasks have been designed to match the learning
outcomes for developing both theoretical and technical insights
and the application of theory to inform their case studies.
This has been designed through the use of reflective submissions
for theoretical insights (via Editorial), and the inclusion
of reflective comments to document development processes within
the case studies.
HOW THE LEARNING DESIGN CHALLENGES LEARNERS
The E-Journal methodology utilises a constructivist activity-based
approach that encourages learner enquiry and initiative. It
affords individual/group selection of the case study focus,
which then guides self-directed progression towards their
final design resolution. Co-operative learning is encouraged
through group work, as well as a shared online environment
for the viewing of peer submissions. Students are challenged
to actively learn both theory and technical aspects of the
topic at hand, as well as to directly apply the theory to
their case studies.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRACTICE
The E-Journal methodology of encouraging students to add submissions
to a shared online environment for group viewing provides
an avenue to demonstrate to both themselves and colleagues
what they are learning. At any point students are able to
view their progression across issues, or within a specific
issue. Fortnightly assessable submissions encourage regular
engagement in both theory and technical aspects, and help
to ensure that students are learning appropriately. The online
tutorial also provides a supportive, flexible and self-paced
environment to learn the fundamentals of their craft, in preparation
for application to their case studies.
|