| WHAT STUDENTS DO The unit is based upon a task where the student takes on 
                    a role in a scenario set in a fictitious university. The context 
                    is one where the student is required to evaluate a website 
                    that has been set up as an exemplar for a consortium of universities 
                    planning to develop a joint online course. The prototype unit 
                    is well presented and employs the multimedia aspects of the 
                    internet well, but it uses a very didactic, content-oriented 
                    approach. The students then, in collaboration with other students 
                    (representatives from the other universities) 
                    recommend a set of guidelines for website development, and 
                    then redesign the original website (or one of their own choosing) 
                    according to those guidelines.  All the tasks are presented in the form of a memo, and are 
                    presented in a realistic manner to reflect the kind of evaluation 
                    and design tasks that might be expected of academics.  
 Example screen display of a "memo" All these tasks require a knowledge of contemporary thought 
                    and research in online learning, and the resources to investigate 
                    this are provided on the unit website. While comprising a 
                    single sustained task, the activity can be evaluated at three 
                    points. So whilst there is one main task it is comprised of 
                    three sub-tasks that make up the assessable components of 
                    the unit.  CRITICAL ACTIVITIES In many ways, all the tasks are critical to this design. 
                    Any one of the tasks could be conducted in isolation but it 
                    is the cumulative experience of the three that characterises 
                    the learning design. SIGNIFICANCE OF ACTIVITIES AND THEIR ORDER The significance of the activities is that the student is 
                    able to reflect on the evaluation and design of learning environments 
                    from an informed perspective. The evaluation allows students 
                    to assess an inadequate learning environment and reflect on 
                    why the site does not work. The next task is the collaborative 
                    building of a model, (based on an extensive reading of literature 
                    and research) and the third is the design of a learning environment 
                    according to the model. The sequence is logical in that students 
                    evaluate a site based on their reading, design a model of 
                    their own and then apply it. |