Learning Designs - Products of the AUTC project on ICT-based learning designs
Home | Exemplars (selected) | Guides | Tools | The Project | Search
  Snapshot Designer's Voice (selected) Cross Links
Implementation
  VLab -Fitness Testing Context Reflections (selected)
 

 



Pedagogy Notes
History
Evaluation
Designer Debrief

top   

Pedagogy Notes

  No particular learning theory was espoused before or during the design phase. It could be argued that the learning design uses a procedural model underpinned by elements of the Gagne-Briggs theory of instruction, particularly the rule-learning and concept-learning elements.

top   

History

 

ORIGIN OF THE LEARNING DESIGN
Meetings were held between faculty and academic development staff to identify the learning problem. Multimedia and software developers suggested a virtual laboratory to address the problems.

TIMES THE LEARNING DESIGN HAS BEEN USED
Approx 4 times (each year) and also utilised to form the basis of two other V-labs.

MODIFICATIONS SINCE FIRST USE
There have been some relatively minor content changes to keep it up-to-date.

DISSEMINATION
V-Lab has been re-used in other exercise physiology related units in the same undergraduate degree program.

It has not been used in other discipline areas.

top   

Evaluation

 

RESEARCH CONDUCTED ON THE DESIGN
No broadly-based research has been conducted on the learning design per se. An initial evaluation was conducted on the implementation of V-Lab. Part of this sought data on students' beliefs about what they learnt. Some findings include:

  • Students believed V-Lab positively affected the extent of their learning.
  • The program was slightly more successful in helping students to carry out fitness testing than in helping them learn to calculate the appropriate data.
  • Over four-fifths of the students believed that V-Lab helped them understand more clearly how to carry out fitness testing for each of the six fitness components.
  • Three-quarters of the students believed that V-Lab helped them to better understand how to calculate the appropriate data for each of the fitness components.
  • Over four-fifths of the students believed that V-Lab helped them understand more clearly how to carry out fitness testing for each of the six fitness components.

Details of the findings are provided in the following publications:

Rice, M. (1998). An evaluation of V-Lab: A virtual laboratory for Human Movement students. Deakin Centre for Academic Development, Deakin University, Geelong.

Rice, M., Owies, D., Campbell, A., Snow, R., Owen, N. and Holt, D (1999). V-Lab: A virtual laboratory for teaching introductory concepts and methods of physical fitness and function. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 188-206. http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/ajet/ajet15/rice.html

top   

Designer Debrief

 

DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS VERSUS INTENDED OUTCOMES
The data suggests that the design was effective for its purpose for a majority of students. Regular unit evaluations confirm the general trend. However, this has not been further validated through more detailed evaluations of students' learning processes and outcomes.

HOW LEARNER ENGAGEMENT IS SUPPORTED
V-Lab was not designed to be a stand-alone resource; it was designed to be one aspect of an overall learning environment. In particular, the design assumes clear integration with face-to-face teacher-supported activities, particularly in laboratories. The learning design supports learner engagement because it is linked closely to these real-time activities. It assumes that students have had very little experience with fitness testing procedures, and that they need practice in order to become competent. V-Lab was designed to enable practice without overcrowding campus laboratories. Learners experience key concepts by working with V-Lab and the the broader internet environment, reading recommended texts, and attending classes.

Within the design itself, students are not asked to reflect on the tests or interact with peers; the design allows for this to occur in face-to-face classes. Nonetheless, students often do interact in pairs or small groups as they work through V-Lab.

The requirement that students use the V-Lab calculator to enter their data into the database supports engagement.

Comment from the Evaluation Team

The evaluators assigned to this exemplar made a judgement that learner engagement appears to be supported effectively, but qualified this conclusion by stating:

"Learner engagement in this design is a function of the manipulation tasks that students are required to accomplish."

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF LEARNING CONTEXT
The learning design acknowledges the learning context. Indeed it is predicated on the immediate learning context, the field of study (exercise physiology) and professional practice. References to broader social or political contexts were not included in the V-Lab design, but when appropriate were sometimes part of class discussions.

The main intent of the design was to assist students to use their learning of fitness test procedures in other situations.

There may be some cultural assumptions built into the design; at the time of design and development, cultural diversity issues were not considered.

Assessment is closely linked to intended learning outcomes. Students are required to conduct fitness testing procedures in real labs.

Comment from the Evaluation Team

The evaluators concur with the designers by stating that the learning design appears to be closely aligned to the learning context.

HOW THE LEARNING DESIGN CHALLENGES LEARNERS
The opportunity to question knowledge and become self-critical is not a feature of V-Lab. The learning design adopts a simple didactic approach;students are offered a range of resources along with V-Lab, some of which they are required to use, others are recommended. Having access to the web enables them to go beyond the resources provided if they wish.

V-Lab is used in units that are largely teacher-directed. To the extent that V-Lab offers flexibility, there is some scope for students to plan when they do the work, but they have no control over assessment.

Comment from the Evaluation Team

The evaluators felt that this learning design was somewhat limited in its potential to "challenge" learners. The designers, in their reflection above, also alert to this.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRACTICE
Although the use of V-Lab is designed to be an individual learning experience, students do sometimes work with each other and articulate what they are doing and learning. This is an ad hoc approach.

The learning design provides practice through repetition of the virtual lab. The test of whether students are learning appropriately from V-Lab is whether or not they are able to carry out the correct procedures for fitness testing in real labs.

Appropriate feedback is available at key points in the learning process through the support mechanisms outlined above. There is a direct alignment between V-Lab activities and laboratory tests.

Comment from the Evaluation Team

The evaluators stated that it was not clear from the documentation provided to them as to the extent to which this learning design provides opportunities for practice but they concluded that the learning design:

"provides a simple and effective content area for student learning. It would motivate and provide students with confidence as they complete the activities. It provides a valuable contribution to their understanding of the topic."

top  

     
  Top of Page Home